Samsung Power Glitch – Is It Important?

3D NANDOn Saturday, June 18, Samsung’s Xian fab, the only facility in the world currently producing 3D NAND flash, suffered a power failure.  How much of a problem is this?

The answer really depends upon who you ask.  An article in the Financial Express quoted Samsung as saying that it would have a minimal impact, and that full-scale operations should resume in a few days.  The article also said that Samsung estimated that the wafer loss would be below 10,000 wafers.

Assuming that the entire loss consisted of Samsung’s most advanced 48-layer 256Gb 3D NAND a 10,000-wafer loss would be less than 1% of total industry gigabyte shipments.

Korea Times quoted an anonymous fund manager who said: “The one-time incident will cost Samsung up to 20 billion won, which is very minimal.  It won’t make heavy impact on Samsung’s chip business and the entire industry.”

According to Korean news source Chosenilbo the outage was caused by: “A blast at a local power station” which the Korea Times article called a fire, and said that that: “Thousands of wafers were being processed at the time of the explosion.”

Barron’s quoted Susquehanna Financial’s analysis, which stated that the fab: “accounts for 28% of Samsung’s NAND wafer capacity and 10-12% of industry capacity.”

While The Memory Guy may disagree with the high percentage quoted by Susquehanna, this kind of event can be significant.  After all, the Sumitomo Chemical explosion in 1992 was the spark that sent the DRAM market into a 3-year shortage.

Keep in mind, too, that Toshiba blamed a power failure of a mere 70 milliseconds duration for the loss of considerable output in December 2010.  Although Samsung hasn’t stated the duration of its power failure, it was certainly orders of magnitude larger.

For now we can do nothing but wait and see what will happen.  Objective Analysis has been cautioning our clients for several months to be prepared for a shortage stemming from a lack of 3D NAND capacity, and that shortage of 3D NAND capacity just got worse.

3 thoughts on “Samsung Power Glitch – Is It Important?”

  1. Micron is also producing 3D NAND.

    So how can say Samsung has the only facility. Unless you are using a very specific definition for “facility”.

    1. G,

      You are correct – Micron is shipping 3D NAND.

      It’s embarrassing for The Memory Guy to have to admit that Micron started shipping 3D NAND-based SSDs four days before I published this post, yet I didn’t know.

      In my defense I will note that neither Micron nor Crucial published press releases to announce that Micron had become only the second company to ship this extraordinarily challenging technology, nor did they give me any notification that this was about to happen.

      As for definitions, it’s my definition for “production” that is very specific. Basically I take a Missouri-style approach: “Show me!”

      Many semiconductor companies tell the world that they are “in production” but nothing appears on the market until quite some time later. Once I see evidence of revenue shipments then I am convinced that the company really IS in production. Micron just crossed that hurdle on June 14.

      Thanks for the comment,


  2. I guess the real criteria for any new vendor shipping 3D NAND is when ChipWorks is publishing a cross section report specific device. In my mind this is the time the product is on the market. At doesn’t tell us how successful is the product.

Comments are closed.